Difference between revisions of "HPFitis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It appears to have a higher incidence in math phobic individuals. | It appears to have a higher incidence in math phobic individuals. | ||
===Consequences of HPFitis=== | |||
*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal |author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ |title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review |journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. |volume=102 |issue=10 |pages=2300–13 |year=2007 |month=October |pmid=17617209 |doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x |url=}}</ref> | |||
*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>. | |||
*Nottingham scoring in [[breast cancer]] is based on the standard of "10 HPFs". | |||
===Field area=== | ===Field area=== | ||
Line 18: | Line 23: | ||
*[[IPFitis]] - a related uncommon disease. | *[[IPFitis]] - a related uncommon disease. | ||
*[[Basics]]. | *[[Basics]]. | ||
==References== | |||
{{Reflist|1}} | |||
[[Category:Rants]] | [[Category:Rants]] |
Revision as of 04:08, 18 October 2015
HPFitis is use of HPF (high-power field) without proper qualification, i.e. without giving the field area.
HPF redirects here.
Etiology
Its etiology is thought to be either:
- Ignorance of statistics and sampling theory.
- Laziness.
- A combination of the above two.
It appears to have a higher incidence in math phobic individuals.
Consequences of HPFitis
- Papers on eosinophilic esophagitis are not comparable.[1]
- GISTs were improperly staged - until they standardized to 5 mm2.
- Nottingham scoring in breast cancer is based on the standard of "10 HPFs".
Field area
Most modern microscopes, have an eye piece diameter of 22 mm. Therefore, the field diameter at 40 X is approximately 22 mm / 40 X ~= 0.55 mm and the field of view is pi/4*(0.55 mm)2 = 0.2376 mm2.
See also
References
- ↑ Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ (October 2007). "Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review". Am. J. Gastroenterol. 102 (10): 2300–13. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x. PMID 17617209.