Difference between revisions of "Cribriform pattern within invasive prostate carcinoma"

From Libre Pathology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Cribriform pattern within invasive prostate carcinoma''' has been shown to be poor prognosticator in [[prostate cancer]].<ref>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Iczkowski | first1 = KA. | last2 = Paner | first2 = GP. | last3 = Van der Kwast | first3 = T. | title = The New Realization About Cribriform Prostate Cancer. | journal = Adv Anat Pathol | volume = 25 | issue = 1 | pages = 31-37 | month = Jan | year = 2018 | doi = 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000168 | PMID = 28820750 }}</ref>
'''Cribriform pattern within invasive prostate carcinoma''' has been shown to be poor prognosticator in [[prostate cancer]].<ref>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Iczkowski | first1 = KA. | last2 = Paner | first2 = GP. | last3 = Van der Kwast | first3 = T. | title = The New Realization About Cribriform Prostate Cancer. | journal = Adv Anat Pathol | volume = 25 | issue = 1 | pages = 31-37 | month = Jan | year = 2018 | doi = 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000168 | PMID = 28820750 }}</ref>
==General==
In the morphologic context, ''invasive cribriform carcinoma'' may be lumped with ''intraductal carcinoma of the prostate'', as immunostains are required to differentiate.<ref name=pmid28530220>{{cite journal |vauthors=Kweldam CF, Kümmerlin IP, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Incrocci L, van der Kwast TH, Roobol MJ, van Leenders GJ |title=Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4&amp;#61;7 prostate cancer |journal=Mod. Pathol. |volume=30 |issue=8 |pages=1126–1132 |date=August 2017 |pmid=28530220 |doi=10.1038/modpathol.2017.29 |url=}}</ref>


==Microscopic==
==Microscopic==
Line 8: Line 5:
*[[Cribriform architecture]].
*[[Cribriform architecture]].
*Loss of basal cells.
*Loss of basal cells.
Note:
*In the morphologic context, ''invasive cribriform carcinoma'' may be lumped with ''intraductal carcinoma of the prostate'', as immunostains are required to differentiate.<ref name=pmid28530220>{{cite journal |vauthors=Kweldam CF, Kümmerlin IP, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Incrocci L, van der Kwast TH, Roobol MJ, van Leenders GJ |title=Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4&amp;#61;7 prostate cancer |journal=Mod. Pathol. |volume=30 |issue=8 |pages=1126–1132 |date=August 2017 |pmid=28530220 |doi=10.1038/modpathol.2017.29 |url=}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 17:52, 11 September 2020

Cribriform pattern within invasive prostate carcinoma has been shown to be poor prognosticator in prostate cancer.[1]

Microscopic

Features:[citation needed]

Note:

  • In the morphologic context, invasive cribriform carcinoma may be lumped with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, as immunostains are required to differentiate.[2]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Iczkowski, KA.; Paner, GP.; Van der Kwast, T. (Jan 2018). "The New Realization About Cribriform Prostate Cancer.". Adv Anat Pathol 25 (1): 31-37. doi:10.1097/PAP.0000000000000168. PMID 28820750.
  2. ↑ "Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4&#61;7 prostate cancer". Mod. Pathol. 30 (8): 1126–1132. August 2017. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.29. PMID 28530220.
Retrieved from "https://librepathology.org/w/index.php?title=Cribriform_pattern_within_invasive_prostate_carcinoma&oldid=50939"